The Goodreads Debacle

For many readers who spend time online, Goodreads is a boon for keeping track of books. I started using it about four years ago, as eager as I was to get the “Books I Want to Read” list out of my head so I wouldn’t miss out on the great books out there by forgetting them. Much to my dismay I discovered that, when not limited by memory, my to-read list has 252 books on it, enough to take five years reading at a fast pace, not counting rereading or thousand-page books, and don’t even think about adding more books to the to-read list.

Image

Despite this fact (hey, at least I’ll never run out of good books to read) Goodreads has really been wonderful at keeping track of the books in my life. So I was more than a little surprised when, first, Amazon bought Goodreads, and when recently, Goodreads announced that they would start deleting certain reviews and bookshelves.

I’m not among the folks who instantly hated Goodreads or even among those who publicly cried out against their choices. But I was a little disappointed. For one thing, Amazon’s ownership of Goodreads makes every move part of Amazon’s statistics. Every star on a book becomes Amazon’s marketing information. And I for one would prefer to keep that information for my own personal use, not for a behemoth company. Maybe it’s the whole support-the-underdog and fear-Big-Brother bias, but I wish Goodreads could have kept to itself. Here’s hoping Goodreads can stick to its independent nature.

As for the more recent news, Goodreads recently announced that they would start being more strict about reviews and bookshelves, meaning that they will exercise the ability to delete said items. According to Goodreads, they will delete a review if it does not focus on the book, but rather the author. They write: “The reviews that have been deleted – and that we don’t think have a place on Goodreads – are reviews like “the author is an a**hole and you shouldn’t read this book because of that”. In other words, they are reviews of the author’s behavior and not relevant to the book.” Goodreads user Emma Sea brings up a good point brought up in many college literary classes: among multiple forms of literary criticism, one such form includes analyzing the author, including their history, their intentions, and how that all connects to the meaning of the book. As such, is it not a form of censorship to ban such reviews?

I have mixed feelings about calling it censorship. But the word “censorship” is a fiery word that pushes buttons, and it’s certainly getting me thinking. Some may argue that the author and their work are completely separate beings, where the relationship between the reader and a book is a new, unique relationship where author consideration is unnecessary. But it’s still an inherent part of reading culture to ask why an author included such-and-such scene, or symbolism, or weird plot point, or what made the author so twisted as to want to write about a father and son in a post-apocalyptic world on the road fighting for their lives when everything is against them (thanks a lot, Cormac McCarthy).

I agree that authors should not be harassed. That’s the golden rule, and no one should have to undergo personal criticism for a work they slaved for months or years over. But where does one draw the line between a critical reading and a personal criticism? How does Goodreads choose that line, and how will they prevent crossing it?

Personally, I’d like to see the reviews that Goodreads has deleted in order to weigh their judgment. I still have trust in Goodreads, but they’ll have to be careful. One too many slipups and they’ll be losing their users.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Goodreads Debacle

  1. I, too, use goodreads on my phone and believe it or not, i always check the reviews for the books before i head out the checkout counter. I use it also for the same purpose that you have. To have a list of books to read. Because most of the time, I always forget books that i want to read when i’m book shopping. I hope we can connect and share thoughts on books!

    • I’m always up for sharing book talk! I do the same thing too before I get a book; I’ve found Goodreads reviews to be very reliable in seeing whether I’ll like a book or not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s